09.07.2013

  • Liberal Meltdown in Colorado - It's A Beautiful Thing!

    THE EPIC MELTDOWN OF THE
    GUN-GRABBERS

    Author: Michelle Malkin
    Source: HumanEvents.com - 9/13/2013

    liberal-losers

    COLORADO SPRINGS — Quick, call the CDC. We’ve got a Rocky Mountain outbreak of Acute Sore Loser Fever. After failing to stave off two historic recall bids on Tuesday, two delusional state legislators and their national party bosses just can’t help but double-down and trash voters as dumb, sick, criminal and profligate.

    The ululations of gun-grabbing Democrats here in my adopted home state are reverberating far and wide. Appearing on cable TV Thursday to answer the question “What happened?” Pueblo State Sen. Angela Giron sputtered that she lost her seat due to “voter suppression.” Giron whined to CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin that voters “weren’t able to get to the polls” and that there was “voter confusion.”

     

    “Voter confusion”? My goodness. You’d think there were no public libraries, local television stations, talk radio, newspapers, blogs, Facebook, Twitter or government websites to get information about the elections. (Oh, and pay no attention to the massive 6-to-1 spending advantage that Giron and her fellow recall target John Morse, formerly the president of the state Senate, enjoyed.)

    “Voter suppression”? Dios mio! You’d think there were New Black Panther Party thugs standing outside the polls shouting racist epithets and waving police batons!

    But no, there was no “voter confusion” or “voter suppression.” In fact, as the Colorado Peak Politics blog pointed out, the “majority of turnout in (Giron’s) district was Democrat, by a large margin. And she still lost. Voter suppression (is) not even believable.”

    Giron lost in her Obama-loving Democratic Senate District 3 by a whopping 12 points. The only significant complaint about voter suppression came after the polls closed — and not from anyone in the district, but from out-of-state Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wah-wah-wah-sserman Schultz of Florida. The majority of constituents who signed the recall petitions against her were, um, Democrats. Would Giron care to argue that voters from the same party that put her in office are too dumb and confused to comprehend her state’s own Constitution and election process?

    Giron was defeated not by elite Republicans and nefarious NRA bigwigs, but by a former Clinton supporter/police chief/campaign neophyte and a couple of upstart citizen activists who make a living as plumbers.

    Grassroots organizers in both Pueblo and El Paso counties with little to no previous electoral experience researched the state constitution’s recall provisions and put in the hard nose-to-the-ground work of gathering thousands of petition signatures in a brief period. They did their homework, adhered to the law and made their voices heard. As I’ve reported in my column over the past several months, it was a David vs. gun-grabbing Goliath battle from the start.

    Only after the local citizens got the ball rolling — catching flack from establishment GOP types who initially opposed the disruptive process — did national organizations weigh in with help. And the campaign cash they provided was still no match for nosybody Bloomberg, Vice President Joe Biden (who personally lobbied state Democratic legislators) and their gun control-freak company.

    The significance of this unprecedented battle cannot be overstated. Self-government won. Demagoguery lost. All the Bloomberg bucks in the world couldn’t buy immunity for his water-carriers in Colorado. The role of Second Amendment-supporting, limited-government-advocating local women in pushing back against false smears was invaluable. The “reproductive rights” fear-mongering failed. And the use of social media to organize echoed other successful tea party efforts.

    The problem for the gun-grabbers wasn’t that the voters were uninformed. It was that they were too informed. Voters paid close attention when state Democrats rigged the game during the legislative debate over extreme gun and ammo restrictions that will do nothing to stop the next Aurora, Columbine or Newtown. They watched fellow citizens being blocked from testifying, pushed aside for out-of-staters. They heard Morse accuse gun owners of having a “sickness in their souls.” They heard him brag to liberal zealots that he was ignoring their “vile” e-mail.

    They rejected Giron’s sneering at grassroots organizers as “special interests.” They didn’t buy that their birth control would disappear. They weren’t swayed by shooting victim Rep. Gabby Gifford’s husband’s emotional appeals or distracted by Bill Clinton’s last-minute robocalls.

    “What happened?” The reasons these petty tyrants lost are as simple as ABC: arrogance, bitterness and contempt for the people. As more and more self-empowered citizens are learning, you can’t fix this stupid hubris. But you can vote it out.


    Michelle Malkin is the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” (Regnery 2010).

  • Spiritually Blind, and Pathetically Apathetic

    Spiritual Blindness

    Author: Lea Sylvester
    Source: Rapture Ready

    blindness2

    Much has been written from a Christian standpoint addressing the state of morality in America today. Great evil abounds and this is only going to get much worse. Some Christians seem to have the attitude that “Jesus will come get us so we will just go about business as usual.” That is exactly what Jesus Christ told us would happen when several of His disciples asked about signs of His coming at the end of the world [Related Article: The Spirit Of This Age]

    We find the following statement in Matthew 24, from The Olivet Discourse:

    Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in My name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet...All these are the beginning of sorrows (Matthew 24: 4-7, 8).

    But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” (Matthew 24:37)

    Jesus markedly said that when we see wars and rumors of wars that we should not be troubled for this is the beginning of sorrows. Then, in a later passage of Scripture, He says that as it was in the days of Noah, so it will also be in the days of His coming. Much can be said about these passages of Scripture but the point that must be made is that these things that we have been observing for some time now are just the beginning.

    Jesus Christ later likens the process as birth pangs. If anyone reading this has ever given birth, then one knows exactly what He was illustrating. These pangs start and are mostly tolerable. But, as time goes by, they get more intense and more frequent. Finally, they are constant and seem unbearable. The end of this severe pain and distress is the delivery of a new life. This pain brings joy. This is exactly what we are experiencing our world today. How long until the evil ends and joy comes?

    In the days of Noah, before the flood, He tells us that people were eating, drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, etc. Basically, this describes a society that is going about “business as usual.” This is how most Christians seem today. We have become so desensitized to events happening in rapid succession, that we don't take note of the frequency of earthquakes that occur daily in various places in the world.

    We see the situation in the Middle East heating up and as Christians we should be greatly concerned. We should take note of the strange weather patterns, the active volcanoes, for all these point to the end. And, the tables have been turned on us as now we are labeled as “enemies of the state,” “intolerant,” “haters,” because when a Christian has the courage to stand up to the social issues that have been forced down our throats that are wrong; they are accused of being a hater or intolerant. [Related Article: They Call Us "Haters"]

    Even in certain churches today immorality is tolerated. It seems even that it is invited. Such an example of this is welcoming homosexuality and those who practice it. After all, God loves homosexuals, doesn't He? Homosexuality is a sin and God does not love it.

    The many sins being tolerated are swept under the pews. We are children of the Most High God! These are unnatural and they are something God hates. And, Believers should NEVER tolerate the intolerant. Recently, in a church located in the city where this writer resides, a speaker was invited to come speak to the congregation. This man, a current candidate for president of the nation of Malawi in Africa, is a mighty, courageous, anointed man of God who has had at least ten attempts on his life. The Islamic faction that currently rules that nation has tried to kill him, and has offered him great wealth if he will step down, but he will not.

    He walks in the will of God. He understands that as an outspoken Christian, he could well lose his life. But, he refuses to back down and he stands. He stands on the foundation of the Word of God. Just several weeks ago, an attempt was made to kidnap his son. Two weeks ago, an attempt was made on the life of his wife. This man, James Nyundo, can never lay his head down in the same place more than one night because it is not safe. And, he never knows where he will be. He has to trust in God for his very life. So, one can see how he would be an exciting speaker for any group of Christians to have the opportunity to hear.

    Nyundo has seen things Christians in the Western world never see or experience, his campaign is being assisted by Christians and Christian churches in his nation. The pastors of these churches and the Christians assisting him willingly do so at the risk of losing their lives. He knows that the only source of freedom comes from God. He knows that God can and will bless his nation but in order to affect change, he must defeat the Muslim opponent.

    During his time speaking at the particular church, a “mainline denominational church,” he spoke about integrity and living a righteous life. He recently wrote a book titled, Absolute Integrity. He doesn't just talk the talk, he walks the walk, and the glow and peace on this man's face says all that needs to be said about His relationship with God. He began to speak about how God hates homosexuality and how God ordained marriage between a man and a woman. He pointed out that any nation that tolerates, promotes or allows homosexuality will be destroyed by God.

    At that particular point, approximately one-half of the large congregation stood and clapped. The other half was absolutely upset! Mr. Nyundo was confused because these were supposedly Christians to whom he was addressing. After the service, the associate pastor, a woman, approached him and attacked him verbally. She was hateful and told him that he was wrong and that he “probably just got the pastor fired.” Nyundo was upset. What did he say? Why were they mad? This was America, a “Christian” nation! Why would they not want to hear the truth?

    The congregation members who were angry were “liberal” Christians who believe that homosexuality is not a sin! Yes, Nyundo said exactly what these people needed to hear, and God sent him to tell them that. But this is the kind of thing that is happening in our churches today. It is just as it was in the days of Noah. Who wants to hear the Word of God? Who will tolerate it? It is so much more pleasant to hear a nice sermon about how to be a good parent. Who wants to hear that sin is bad?

    This example is not unusual and it emphasizes how very disconnected most Christians in America are from the rest of Christendom around the world. People like Nyundo have endured severe hardship and have seen fellow Christians persecuted and even murdered for their faith. They don't sit in comfortable pews and rationalize that God's Word isn't relevant today. No, they can't get enough of it and they love to hear ALL of it. And, despite the teachings of many churches today that there is no such thing as demonic possession or that “gifts” of the Holy Spirit are no more, or that there are no miracles today; these people in tiny nations and in third-world nations have seen and have experienced first-hand these very things.

    But, for Nyundo, it was never his expectation to experience what he called being confronted by a “demonic presence” in the person who verbally abused him. And, it stunned him that this happened in America. America - the very nation that had been greatly blessed by God Himself, for putting Him first in all things. But, that is the past.

    What are we doing, brethren? We have become pathetically politically correct. We have rejected God's Word. Dictionary dot com. defines “politically-correct” in the following manner:

    “Marked by or adhering to a progressive orthodoxy on issues especially involving gender, race, sexual affinity or ecology.”

    The dictionary site notes that it is language of the progressive left. Unless we have a worldview compatible with the godless philosophy that sees man as essentially helpless and misguided, in need of a ruling class to take care of them �" we have no business falling into the trap of permitting the progressive left to control the terms of almost every conversation.
    [Related Article: Deconstructing Liberal Tolerance]

    We use their terms, which are never favorable toward the true conditions in our land. We permit them to use the term pro-choice, when they only choice they believe in is the choice to end the life of an unborn infant. They don’t believe we should have choices about the food we eat, our environment, even our light bulbs. It’s time to put an end our acceptance of their terminology, which is designed to sound good, and conceal their anti-life, anti-freedom agenda. [Related Article: The Psychopathology Of the Liberal Mind]

    What happens when we stand up to the politically correct masters? What happens when we utter such things as we find in the Bible like the sinfulness of homosexuality, or that Jesus is the only way to heaven? The ruling class immediately goes into personal destruction mode. They roll out their closed minded, racist, hater rhetoric. There are some thoughts and ideas that they believe dare not be expressed, lest the lies of the ruling class be exposed.

    don't_speak

    If we really believe they are lies, they need to be exposed. They tell us there is no God, or if there is, he is the god of the liberation theologian interested in creating a socialist paradise on earth. They tell us that restricting marriage to a man and a woman is discriminatory and we need to be open to other types of relationships. They tell us that the welfare of children is the responsibility of the state more than the parents.

    We are told that everyone has their own truth, that what is true for one may not be true for another. We are told that the truth of the Bible is fine for us if we choose to make it so, but others may come up with their own truth. We are just being closed minded and old fashioned if we believe everyone should be working with the same truth.
    [Related Article: Is One Way the Only Way?]

    At this point the relativists are ahead in the public sphere of ideas, primarily because too many people, too many churches, too many pastors have been intimidated into either complete silence or they have changed their message to make it acceptable to the ruling class.

    There is a price to pay when we stand up for the truth. George Orwell told us, “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” It is treasonous to the homosexual rights advocate to say that the Bible condemns their practice. They tell us that they were born that way. God Almighty, the God of Abraham, Jacob and Israel, does not make such mistakes, nor does He put a man in a woman’s body by accident. Our society has arrived at the point where so many accept the arrogance of those who say their work is to “fix” God’s mistakes.

    With so many dysfunctional families, is it really a mystery how we end up with so many messed up children who become messed up adults that have no idea who they are? Christians! Arise! This is a spiritual war and we are losing the battle. Take up your sword (The Word of God) and speak the truth. Tolerate no more pithy sermonettes from your pulpits. Demand that your pastor preach the entire Word of God or show him the door. [Related Article: And the Pulpits Are Silent]

    What we see happening in our churches today is parallel to what happened in Jesus' ministry. He was questioned by the religious “authorities” of Judaism.

    They had added their own “interpretations” and “extra-rituals” to His commandments and couldn't bear the fact that He stood in defiance to them. He defied and taught against the traditions of Judaism. These were men who put tradition above God's Word. The same thing is taking place in the church today.

    The Pharisees asked Jesus why His disciples did not observe the traditions of Judaism. Notice Jesus' reply: He answered and said to them, 'Full well ye reject the commandment of God [disobey], that ye may keep your own tradition (Mark 7:9).

    Jesus said, Well hath Esaias [Isaiah] prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, this people honore me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. Howbeit in vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men (Mark 7:6).

    Jesus revered and followed God's Word, His commandments. Jesus told us that if we love Him, we will keep His commandments. This is not an “optional” thing for a Christian. Yet, today because we have been taught that Christians don't obey God's commandments, we seem to have made our own religion. If Jesus Christ and His disciples and the early church followed these teachings to the letter, then why are we exempt?

    And, can we now see how failing to do so has been exploited by the enemy to bring this politically-correctness into the church? This has also allowed the great apostasy and ignorance of the deeper things of God. The church is the one place this should never be! The gates of hell are not supposed to prevail against the church but the gates of hell have flung wide-open the doors of the church. And the reaction? Silence.

    blind_christians

    Jesus and his disciples followed the commandments of keeping God's Feasts (His appointed times). In almost every account we read of Jesus being in Jerusalem, it was for one of those feasts in which going to Jerusalem was required. Yet, we are taught that we are exempt from God's feasts; the very ones that God Himself said, “These are My feasts to be observed forever” (Leviticus 23:41).

    Had Jesus failed to keep these holy convocations (meetings or gatherings mandated by God Himself to be observed forever), he would have committed sin. Jesus had to be sinless. If it was “optional” then why did He diligently do so? Why? Because it wasn't optional for the Son of God and it isn't optional for us as Christians. But “man” has said otherwise. Do we serve God or do we serve men? We cannot do both.

    When people reject the Word of God and devise their own religious traditions, they automatically bring spiritual blindness upon themselves.

    Isaiah said:

    Stay yourselves, and wonder, cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink. For the Lord hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers he hath covered. And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot for it is sealed.
    And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of man.
    Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid
    ”.
    (Isaiah 29: 9-14)

    Is what Isaiah described in the passage of Scripture above not a perfect description of the entire world today in religion, science, government, education and economics? Again, what a paradox: They use the Bible and profess to believe in God, but cannot understand the Scriptures. Other prophecies about the end-times confirm that God's people would understand the Word of God and prophecy, while the wicked, the majority of people in the world would not understand.

    Truth must be told, but it must be done in love as a parent correcting a child. This writer is not condemning those in error. Not only have Christians today become tolerant of the intolerant allowing great apostasy to reign; we have forsaken the duty of lifting one another up. We should not attack our brethren, what does this accomplish? What good could come of it?

    But, while we tolerate sin, great abominations; we are intolerant of our own brothers and sisters in Christ when they speak the Word of God - the Truth. To be silent and allow this apostasy in our churches, to allow this tolerance for sin (i.e., homosexuality, adultery, idolatry, etc.) is the real act of condemnation to the catastrophic results that await those who are silent, therefore complicit in these sins.

    May we all plead for forgiveness, not only from our God, but those who have been led astray by our silence. If the truth shall set us free… why are we feeling the weight of chains growing heavier with each passing day?

    set_free

  • Believing the False Prophets

    Making God’s People Trust A Lie

    Author: Pastor Bill Randles
    Source: Believers in Grace Ministries - 04.09.2008

    It is happening all over again. In the church, as in the last days of Judah, immediately preceding the devastation of the Babylonian captivity and the destruction of the temple, Christians are being inoculated against conviction and preparedness by the soothing Words of false prophets like Hananiah.

    1timothy_4_1-2

    By prophets, in this paper, I refer to the broad meaning of the term, and not the narrow. Anyone who stands in a pulpit or in the name of God speaks as a messenger of God is a prophet in a sense. Pastors and teachers in the Christian church have a responsibility to speak for God to this dying culture. There is a sense in which all Christians are prophets. After all, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Ezekiel and the other Biblical prophets didn’t go about giving ‘words’ to individuals, and slaying them in the Spirit. Read their messages, they were preachers, who called the people back to the God who had saved them and made covenant with them! In that sense every pastor or teacher in the Christian church should see themselves as an Isaiah or Jeremiah. [Related Article: And the Pulpits Are Silent]

    Then said the prophet Jeremiah unto Hananiah, the Prophet, Hear now Hananiah; The Lord hath not sent thee; but thou makest this people to trust in a lie.(Jeremiah 28:15)

    Of course it is no wonder that Hananiah was better received. Hananiah’s “word’ was uplifting, and encouraging. To a people already partially humiliated by a deportation of their own nobility and a stripping of the vessels of their holy temple- Hananaih a priest proclaimed in God’s name that “I have broken the yoke of the King of Babylon. Within two full years will I bring again into this place all of the vessels of the Lord’s House…”(Jeremiah 28:2-3). Such confidence!

    Part of the problem with Hananiah’s message is that there is no consideration of the fact that it was sin and backsliding that caused that humiliation, (which he so boldly prophesied a reversal of). There was no mention of repentance, no vindication of God’s charges against the people, no connection between the people’s suffering and the wrath of the God of the covenant. He merely prophesied peace and restoration and victory. He preached a God of Love, but love only. [Related Article: Deception In the Church]

    Contrast that encouraging Word with the one given to the ‘weeping prophet’, Jeremiah, that Judah would go into captivity for seventy years (Jeremiah 29:10), and that Nebuchadnezzar, a pagan king was God’s servant (Jeremiah 25:9) and adding insult to injury - that the best recourse was to see in the Babylonian invasion and captivity the good hand of God and to humbly submit to it. Does that sound like faith and confidence? Where is the patriotism in that?

    Jeremiah too preached a God of Love, but as all true prophets do, he correctly showed forth the Love of God in its true context, which is the Holiness of God. Indeed, God is Love and God is Holy. His love is Holy love. God is Sovereign. There would be a restoration, but on God’s terms and by God’s own means. The problem Jeremiah’s contemporaries had with his preaching was that it wasn’t man centered.
    [Related Article: A Social Gospel?]

    Contrast also the differences in the position Jeremiah and Hananiah held in Judean society. Hananiah was a priest, and highly regarded. He had a following. Jeremiah was expelled from the temple- his preaching was ridiculed, and disregarded, for the most part. His message was of God's Judgment and coming wrath. It seemed defeatist and unpatriotic, and furthermore, Jeremiah himself seemed emotionally unstable and near having a nervous breakdown! (Jeremiah 9:1-2)
    [Related Article: Crossing Paths with God]

    The same choices are being presented to God’s people today. The Evangelical church can be likened unto Judah in Jeremiah’s day. They are the remnant of God’s people, the witness to a perishing world, the pillar and ground of the Truth. And for them there are Jeremiah’s indeed, calling God’s people to true godliness, making them ready for the coming judgments, taking their eyes off of this temporal life and fitting them for eternity. Insisting on adherence to the word of the covenant. Because we live in such a potent, toxic culture, we need strong, God centered preaching.
    [Related Article: This Is A War Briefing]

    follow-jesus

    But for every Jeremiah there are a hundred Hananiah’s. They run interference, deflecting conviction, soothing a backslidden people, “…hearken not unto the words of the prophets unto you; they make you vain; they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. They say still unto them that despise me, the Lord hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say everyone that walketh after the imagination of their own heart, No evil shall come upon you…(Jeremiah 23:16-17) At a time when people should be taught to fear the Lord, and turn to Him, the effect of false prophets is the opposite!
    [Related Articles: They Claim To Speak for God-Part One and Part Two]

    This issue is of serious consequence. At stake is the readiness of the church for ‘perilous times’. The effect of false prophets in Jeremiah’s day was to strengthen the people against repentance, rendering them liable to the judgment of God. As Jeremiah predicted that the people would one day lament- “the Harvest is past, the summer is ended and we are not saved”. (Jeremiah 8:20)

    Just what are the lies that God’s people are being asked to trust in by the new Hananiah’s?

    Here are three huge ones:

    1. You don’t have to take God seriously.

    I believe that there are literally many people preaching in pulpits and sitting in Christian pews who ‘despise God’. The new preaching is casual, informal, almost ‘anti-reverent’, as if reverence for God is ‘religious’, stuffy and unspiritual. A ‘youth minister’ at a Christian college chapel service I attended, actually prayed in the “kick butt’ name of Jesus! Such irreverence is seen as being “non-religious”, “relevant’ and is no doubt seen as ‘being real’ [Related Article: A Shocking Message for Christian Youth!]
    God’s attributes and perfections are not generally being proclaimed by ministers. As Hosea cried out - “there is no truth, mercy, no knowledge of God” . (Hosea 4:1) [Related Article: Wake Up!]

    proverbs-9-10

    2. The lie of a ‘nonjudgmental’ God.

    The idea of a God of Holy Wrath, of vindictive judgment, is being denied these days, if not openly, than by non emphasis. Church growth ‘experts’ have cautioned against the ‘courtroom model’of evangelism in favor of a more ‘relational’ style. Hell and the lake of fire themselves are being denied in evangelical circles these days as pastors and congregations seek to make unchurched ‘seekers’ feel comfortable in their congregations. Real grace, the true Love of God as revealed by the gospel, presupposes wrath and Judgment. It is from “the wrath of God” which is being “revealed from heaven against all unrighteousness and ungodliness of men”, that we are saved from. Jesus died to answer to the claims of a Righteous and Holy God against us. Wherever this doctrine is de-emphasized, there is a Hananiah at work.
    [Related Article: The Seeker-Friendly Way of Doing Church]

    3. Humanistic lies, including the denial of sin and the denial of man's sinful nature.

    This is the Lie that people aren’t really so bad. Read Jeremiah sometime and contrast His urgency and grief with his the complacency of his hearers. They didn’t really believe that they were in such danger, they “trusted in a lie”, “the Temple of the Lord, The Temple of the Lord!” they would say-they took refuge in mere clichés. The false prophets bolstered them in this vain confidence.

    baby-christian-food

    It seems to be happening again, The false prophets are once again ‘making God’s people trust in a lie’, the people are not blameless, for once again as in Jeremiah’s day, "The prophets prophesy falsely, the priests bear rule by their means, and my people love to have it so, people love to have it so, but what will you do in the end?(Jeremiah 5:31)

  • Why Will Most Reject God's Grace?

    Why Most People Will Reject “Free” Grace

    Author: Dan Ecklund
    Source: RaptureReady.com

    go-and-sin-no-more

    The late, Dr. D. James Kennedy said, “The vast majority of people who are members of churches in America today are not Christians. I say that without the slightest contradiction. I base it on empirical evidence of twenty-four years of examining thousands of people.”
    [Related Article: Standing Against Richmond, VA]

    How well do you believe the following verse?

    Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law; for by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified(Galatians 2:16).

    This is something quoted often inside Christianity, but is not always believed. The gospel at the core is not designed to be something easy to follow, but rather to be hard for a mind to accept. It is hard to understand math, and will not be accepted by most people including those who sit in church buildings. To show an example of how challenging this gospel math is, consider the following true tales of sad souls.
    [Related Article: Concerns for Company and Coworkers]

    Most people know the name of Jeffrey Dahmer who strangled and dismembered seventeen boys and men and cannibalized some of them. The world was shocked at the dark tale of what this man did, a true symbol of how evil a man could be. He was reported to pick up these men from gay bars, torture them, and commit unthinkable acts. Most people were ready to see this man burned alive for his crime, yet there was another that took another approach.

    Pastor Roy Ratcliffe began meeting with Dahmer for a number of years, going though Scripture with him, and explaining the gospel. According to Jeffrey Dahmer’s confession, he trusted in Jesus alone for the forgiveness of sin. Sometime later, after being attacked in jail, Dahmer wrote, “I don’t know if you heard, but last Sunday I was attacked while in the chapel. Some guy tried to cut my throat open with a razor but didn’t succeed. The razor broke, and my neck was only slightly scratched. I believe that it was only the protective grace of our Great Lord and Savior Jesus Christ that saved me from serious injury or death!”

    Pastor Ratcliffe did suffer backlash from his desire to share the gospel with Dahmer. Several members reportedly left his church. Some cited that God would never let a monster like that into heaven. This reaction is based on the false beliefs that God requires you to have a measure of your own goodness to enter into heaven, and they were less of a sinner than Dahmer, so therefore he was less worthy of the gospel than they were.

    the-foursquare-gospel

    There is another soul to examine, one much kinder.

    Let us look at Teresa of Calcutta, M.C., commonly known as Mother Teresa. Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity, a Roman Catholic religious congregation which in 2012 consisted of over 4,500 sisters and is active in 133 countries. They run hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup kitchens; children’s and family counseling programs; orphanages and schools. Members of the order must adhere to the vows of chastity, poverty and obedience, and the fourth vow, to give “Wholehearted and free service to the poorest of the poor.” (Wikipedia)

    Her works are well known, helping countless numbers of people. She was a strong valued person, pro-life, outspoken on issues of life and the value of children. There is something of note in her belief system. In her book, Life in the Spirit: Reflections, Meditations, and Prayers, she says on pages 81 and 82:

    We never try to convert those who receive (aid) to Christianity but in our work we bear witness to the love of God’s presence and if Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists or agnostics become for this better men - simply better - we will be satisfied. It matters to the individual what church he belongs to. If that individual thinks and believes that this is the only way to God for her or him, this is the way God comes into their life - his life. If he does not know any other way and if he has no doubt so that he does not need to search then this is his way to salvation.

    Mother Teresa continues to directly contradict the Bible and New Testament teachings concerning genuine salvation in another article:

    Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him.” (“Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths,” AP, Sept. 7, 1997)

    Statements such as these are in conflict with Scripture. Salvation is by faith alone, in Christ alone, and not by works or any other gods. If the gospel is to be believed, we must reach a conclusion that is not going to be easy to accept. If these statements are truly believed about both of the souls, then we must accept the possibility the Jeffrey Dahamer is in heaven, and Mother Teresa is in Hell.
    [Related Articles: Nice People Go To Hell and Roman Catholicism vs. Christianity]

    Do you see the problem that a natural man will always have with the gospel? Religious men believe their salvation is based on their worth to God, yet the Scriptures remove our value in the salvation process. Salvation is all about the work of God, who died to the sins of all men, so that all who turn and trust in Him alone, in the payment for sin provided.
    [Related Article: Praying for the Sedgefield Community in Ashland, VA]

    Who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus,who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time(1 Timothy 2:4-6).

    This is, hard to understand math. The gospel says we have nothing to offer God but our evil desires and our sin, but He offers a free gift if we come to Him. What are you going to accept? Are your works making you better than other sinners, or are you going to see yourself as someone who has nothing but Christ alone?

    break-free

  • CNN Caught Faking Syrian News Reports

    CNN Caught Staging News Segments on Syria With Actors


    Anderson Cooper and CNN have been caught staging fake news about Syria to justify military intervention.

    Author: JG Vibes
    Source: IntelliHub - 9.03.2013

    syrian_rebels_2013


    The primary “witness” that the mainstream media is using as a source in Syria has been caught staging fake news segments. Recent video evidence proves that “Syria Danny”, the supposed activist who has been begging for military intervention on CNN, is really just a paid actor and a liar.

    While Assad is definitely a tyrant like any head of state, a US invasion of the country is a worst case scenario for the people living there.

    By pointing out that the mainstream media is orchestrating their entire coverage of this incident, we are not denying that there is a tremendous amount of death and violence in Syria right now. However, we are showing that the mainstream media version of events is scripted and staged propaganda.
    [Related Article: Syrian Rebels Caught Sneaking Sarin Gas Across Border In May]

    The following video shows him contradicting himself while off air, and even asking crew members to “get the gunfire sounds ready” for his video conference with Anderson Cooper on CNN:

    “Syria Danny” has also appeared on many other news programs, and every single time his story on specific events has changed.

    This is not the first time that mainstream media has been exposed as propaganda, it happens all the time, especially during times of war.
    [Related Article: Rebels Admit Responsibility for Chemical 'Attack']

    Some of the most hyped up news images of our time surrounding war were not actually real but were simply public relations stunts, designed as psychological warfare operations.

    No one in America can forget the image of Saddam Hussein’s statue being toppled and covered with an American flag, yet few people realize that this was a hoax, a staged psychological operation coordinated between the military and the media. In July of 2004 journalist Jon Elmer exposed an internal army study of the war showing that this whole statue scenario was indeed a set up.

    In the article Elmer writes, “the infamous toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square in central Baghdad on April 9, 2003 was stage-managed by American troops and not a spontaneous reaction by Iraqis. According to the study, a Marine colonel first decided to topple the statue, and an Army psychological operations unit turned the event into a propaganda moment… The Marines brought in cheering Iraqi children in order to make the scene appear authentic, the study said. Allegations that the event was staged were made in April of last year, mostly by opponents of the war, but were ignored or ridiculed by the US government and most visible media outlets. “[1]
    [Related Article: The Sovietized American Media]

    The statue hoax was just one example in a long list of lies and psychological operations surrounding the multiple wars in Iraq. At the onset of Operation Desert Storm in 1990 a public relations firm by the name of Hill and Knowlton spent millions of dollars on the government’s behalf, constructing news pieces that would sell the war to the American public. One of the most moving pranks to come from this push to war was the testimony of a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl, known only by her first name of Nayirah. In a videotaped testimony that was later distributed to the media she said “I volunteered at the al-Addan hospital, While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go into the room where . . . babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.”

    Sounds horrible huh? Well, luckily it never happened, this too was a fabricated event designed to dehumanize the Iraqi people. The whole thing was exposed when the journalists discovered that the witness Nayirah was actually the daughter of a US ambassador who was being coaxed by military psychological operations specialists. If the government and media cooperate to deceive the American public during times of war then there should be no doubt in your mind that the same techniques are used during times of peace, and especially elections.

    The following clip is another classic staged news segment that was aired by CNN:

    Footnotes:

    [1] Army report confirms Psy-ops staged Saddam statue topplingThe New Standard

  • Syrian Rebels Admit Responsibility for 'Attack'

    false-flag-politics

    [Over the course of the Labor Day weekend I came across news reports that indicate Syrian rebels have admitted to an AP reporter that they mishandled chemical weapons which resulted in the "attack" as claimed by the Western mainstream press and governments. Here are two such articles, one was released at VoiceofRussia.com, and another released at GlobalResearch.ca. A third source can be found at MintPressNews.com. SJ]

    Jabhat al-Nusra Rebels Admit Responsibility for Chemical Weapons Attack

    Author: Paul Joseph Watson
    Source: Global Research - September 01, 2013

    Militants tell AP reporter they mishandled Saudi-supplied chemical weapons, causing accident...

    syrian-rebels


    Syrian rebels in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta have admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they were responsible for last week’s chemical weapons incident which western powers have blamed on Bashar Al-Assad’s forces, revealing that the casualties were the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling chemical weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia.

    “From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,” writes Gavlak. (back up version here).

    Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.

    “We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” one militant named ‘J’ told Gavlak.

    His claims are echoed by another female fighter named ‘K’, who told Gavlak, “They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”

    Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of an opposition rebel, also told Gavlak, “My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” describing them as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.” The father names the Saudi militant who provided the weapons as Abu Ayesha.

    According to Abdel-Moneim, the weapons exploded inside a tunnel, killing 12 rebels.

    “More than a dozen rebels interviewed reported that their salaries came from the Saudi government,” writes Gavlak.

    If accurate, this story could completely derail the United States’ rush to attack Syria which has been founded on the “undeniable” justification that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack. Dale Gavlak’s credibility is very impressive. She has been a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR) and written articles for BBC News.

    The website on which the story originally appeared - Mint Press - is a legitimate media organization based in Minnesota. The Minnesota Post did a profile on them last year.

    Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in providing rebels, whom they have vehemently backed at every turn, with chemical weapons, is no surprise given the revelations earlier this week that the Saudis threatened Russia with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi unless they abandoned support for the Syrian President.

    “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” Prince Bandar allegedly told Vladimir Putin, the Telegraph reports.

    The Obama administration is set to present its intelligence findings today in an effort prove that Assad’s forces were behind last week’s attack, despite American officials admitting to the New York Times that there is no “smoking gun” that directly links President Assad to the attack.

    US intelligence officials also told the Associated Press that the intelligence proving Assad’s culpability is “no slam dunk.”

    As we reported earlier this week, intercepted intelligence revealed that the Syrian Defense Ministry was making “panicked” phone calls to Syria’s chemical weapons department demanding answers in the hours after the attack, suggesting that it was not ordered by Assad’s forces.

    UPDATE: Associated Press contacted us to confirm that Dale Gavlak is an AP correspondent, but that her story was not published under the banner of the Associated Press. We didn’t claim this was the case, we merely pointed to Gavlak’s credentials to stress that she is a credible source, being not only an AP correspondent, but also having written for PBS, BBC and Salon.com.

    [----------------------------------------------------------]


    'Syrian rebels take responsibility for the chemical attack admitting the weapons were provided by Saudis'

    Source: VoiceOfRussia.com - August 30, 2013

    syrian_rebels

    In an interview with Dale Gavlak, a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press and Mint Press News, Syrian rebels tacitly implied that they were responsible for last week’s chemical attack. Some information could not immediately be independently verified.

    “From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,” she writes in the article.

    The rebels noted it was a result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling chemical weapons provided to them.

    “My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” said Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of a rebel fighting to unseat Assad, who lives in Ghouta.

    As Gavlak reports, Abdel-Moneim said his son and 12 other rebels died in a weapons storage tunnel. The father stated the weapons were provided to rebel forces by a Saudi militant, known as Abu Ayesha, describing them as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”

    “They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” complained a female fighter named ‘K’. “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”

    “When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must give them to those who know how to handle and use them,” she warned. She, like other Syrians, do not want to use their full names for fear of retribution.

    Gavlak also refers to an article in the UK’s Daily Telegraph about secret Russian-Saudi talks stating that Prince Bandar threatened Russian President Vladimir Putin with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if Russia doesn’t agree to change its stance on Syria.

    “Prince Bandar pledged to safeguard Russia’s naval base in Syria if the Assad regime is toppled, but he also hinted at Chechen terrorist attacks on Russia’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if there is no accord,” the article stated.

    “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” Saudi Prince allegedly told Vladimir Putin.

    MintPressNews.com stated that some of the information couldn’t be independently verified and pledged to continue providing updates on this topic.

  • The Uncertain Future Facing Syrian Christians

    Syria’s Christians Risk Eradication

    A post-Assad Islamist regime threatens to re-enact the Armenian genocide.

    Author: Philip Jenkins
    Source: The American Conservative - 09.04.2013

    U.S. policy towards Syria is bafflingly inconsistent. If U.S. leaders are so concerned about regimes slaughtering thousands of their own people, did they notice what just happened in Egypt? If they are so exercised over about weapons of mass destruction, are they aware that Israel has two hundred nuclear warheads, with delivery systems? Will American warships in the region be making those other stops on their liberating mission?

    Most puzzling of all, though, is why the United States seems so determined to eradicate Christianity in one of its oldest heartlands, at such an agonizingly sensitive historical moment.

    Syria has always been a complex place religiously. Although the country has a substantial Sunni Muslim majority, it also has large minority communities—Christians, Alawites, and others—who together make up over a quarter of the population. Those communities have survived very successfully in Syria for centuries, but the present revolution is a threat to their continued existence.

    Sadly, Westerners tend to assume that Arabs are, necessarily, Muslims, and moreover, that Muslims are a homogeneous bunch. Actually, 10 percent of Syrians are Alawites, members of a notionally Islamic sect that actually draws heavily from Christian and even Gnostic roots: they even celebrate Christmas. Locally, they were long known as Nusayris, “Little Christians.” Syria is also home to several hundred thousand Druze, who are even further removed from Sunni orthodoxy.

    And then there are the Christians. If Christianity began in Galilee and Judea, it very soon made its cultural and intellectual home in Syria. The Apostle Paul famously visited Damascus, and for centuries Antioch was one of the world’s greatest Christian centers. (The city today stands just over the Turkish border.) A sizable Christian population flourished under Islamic rule, and continued under the Ottomans. Muslim and Christian populations always interacted closely here. A shrine in Damascus’s Great Mosque claims to be the location of John the Baptist’s head.

    damascus_at_night
    Damascus

    Christian numbers fluctuated dramatically over time. A hundred years ago, “Syria,” broadly defined, was home to a large and diverse Christian population, including Catholics, Orthodox, and Maronites. In the 1920s, the French arbitrarily carved out the country’s most Christian sections and designated that region “Lebanon,” with its capital at Beirut.

    In theory, that partition should have drawn a clear line between Christian Lebanon and non-Christian Syria. But Syria itself was changing in the aftermath of the catastrophic events of the First World War. The year 1915 marked the beginning of the horrendous genocide of perhaps 1.5 million Armenians, as well as hundreds of thousands of Assyrians, Maronites, and other Christian groups. After the war, Christians increasingly concentrated in Syria, where they benefited from French protection.

    Arab Christians, though, were anything but imperial puppets. Determined to avoid a repetition of the horrors of 1915, Christians struggled to create a new political order in which they could play a full role. This meant advocating fervent Arab nationalism, a thoroughly secular order in which Christians and other minorities could avoid being overwhelmed by the juggernaut power of Sunni Islam. All Arab peoples, regardless of faith, would join in a shared passion for secular modernity and pan-Arab patriotism, in stark contrast to reactionary Islamism. The pioneering theorist of modern Arab nationalism was Damascus-born Orthodox Christian Constantine Zureiq. Another Orthodox son of Damascus was Michel Aflaq, co-founder of the Ba’ath (Renaissance) Party that played such a pivotal role in the modern history of both Iraq and Syria.

    Since the 1960s, Syria has been a Ba’athist state, which in practice has meant the hegemony of the religious minorities who dominate the country’s military and intelligence apparatus. Hafez al-Assad (President from 1971 through 2000) was of course an Alawite, but by the 1990s, five of his seven closest advisers were Christian. His son Bashar is the current president, and America’s nemesis in the region.

    Quite apart from their political influence, Christians have done very well indeed in modern Syria. Although they try to avoid drawing too much attention, it is no secret that Aleppo (for instance) has a highly active Christian population. Christian numbers have even grown significantly since the 1990s, as Iraqis fled the growing chaos in that country. Officially, Christians today make up around 10 percent of Syria’s people, but that is a serious underestimate, as it omits so many refugees, not to mention thinly disguised crypto-believers. A plausible Christian figure is at least 15 percent, or three million people.

    To describe the Ba’athist state’s tolerance is not, of course, to justify its brutality, or its involvement in state-sanctioned crime and international terrorism. But for all that, it has sustained a genuine refuge for religious minorities, of a kind that has been snuffed out elsewhere in the region. Although many Syrian Christians favor democratic reforms, they know all too well that a successful revolution would almost certainly put in place a rigidly Islamist or Salafist regime that would abruptly end the era of tolerant diversity. Already, Christians have suffered terrible persecution in rebel-controlled areas, with countless reports of murder, rape, and extortion.

    Under its new Sunni rulers, minorities would likely face a fate like that in neighboring Iraq, where the Christian share of population fell from 8 percent in the 1980s to perhaps 1 percent today. In Iraq, though, persecuted believers had a place to which they could escape, namely Syria. Where would Syrian refugees go?

    A month ago, that question was moot, as the Assad government was gaining the upper hand over the rebels. At worst, it seemed, the regime could hold on to a rump state in Syria’s west, a refuge for Alawites, Christians, and others. And then came the alleged gas attack, and the overheated U.S. response.

    So here is the nightmare. If the U.S., France, and some miscellaneous allies strike at the regime, they could conceivably so weaken it that it would collapse. Out of the ruins would emerge a radically anti-Western regime, which would kill or expel several million Christians and Alawites. This would be a political, religious, and humanitarian catastrophe unparalleled since the Armenian genocide almost exactly a century ago.

    Around the world, scholars and intellectual leaders are debating how to commemorate the approaching centennial of that cataclysm in 2015. Through its utter lack of historical awareness, the United States government may be pushing towards not a commemoration of the genocide but a faithful re-enactment.

    Even at this late moment, can they yet be brought to see reason?

    Phillip_Jenkins

    Philip Jenkins is Distinguished Professor of History at Baylor University and serves as Co-Director for the Program on Historical Studies of Religion in the Institute for Studies of Religion.

  • The Fake News Is the New News

    Everything is Fake Now

    Author: Daniel Greenfield
    Source: the Sultan Knish blog - August 28, 2012

    “Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away,” Philip K. Dick said, when asked to define what reality is. Dick was a Science Fiction writer and that seems appropriate enough we are living in a Science Fiction world where there is no reality anymore, because the real goes away, but the unreal does not.

    dali-illusion

    Virtual reality, it turned out, was not some complicated gizmo that made you look like a blind skier and allowed you to enter into another world, instead it was an unreal world being comprehensively overlaid on top of our own. The lines between the real and the unreal haven't blurred because the unreal has gotten so much more sophisticated. The unreal is more fake than ever, but discerning that has become more difficult now that the real has gone away.

    As we watch the news covering a story, what we are actually watching is the media making up a story and then telling that story incessantly and embedding it in every nook and cranny of their coverage. This blurring of the lines between the real and the fake is not happening thanks to the magic of technology, but the prosaic methods of complete insincerity.

    The fake is being overlaid on the real, like men fighting on top of a board with a movie of a train passing by in the background to give the impression that they are fighting on top of it. Such cheap trickery defines our media environment where reporters barge into events and badger the participants into playing along with their movie. Or they just play the clip of actual events and frame them so that everyone hears their version of what is going on.
    [Related Article: CNN Caught Faking Syrian News Reports]

    american_sheeple

    There's Godzilla and we know he's real because we can see Tokyo in the background. There's the latest media narrative and we know it's real, because we can see Tampa in the background as some blow-dried buffoon does breathing exercises before commencing to tell us that the Republican Party, which supports things that would have made Ike and Ron have coronaries, has gone so far to the right that it might as well be a Godzilla of reactionary running dog capitalism.

    This is our shoddy virtual reality with a CNN or MSNBC logo planted on top. There is you still sitting on your same old couch, watching Chris Matthews yelling himself hoarse about racism, because racism is our virtual reality. It is the world that we are supposed to live in and Chris' job, for which he receives some 5 million a year, is to convince us that we are living in it.

    "Racism," Chris yells at the screen, like the idiot shaman of some stone age tribe, and those dull-witted enough to believe him nod knowingly, because it makes them feel as if they know something. And in a world where nothing is real, knowing something makes them feel a little less confused. They don't understand why the prices are suddenly so high and the bank won't give them a loan-- but they can understand that Republicans are bad people and somehow responsible for it.
    [Related Article: 7 Media Secrets]

    Some 70 percent of Barack Obama's Twitter followers may be fake, but why quibble at such numbers. The people who decided to make Obama popular did so through constant repetition that translated into the peer pressure of the trend. Obama became a trending topic and everyone followed along because in an unreal world, you follow the unreal leader.

    Obama is fake, his popularity is fake, but it's also real, because fake is now the ultimate reality. The purveyors of fakeness have demonstrated their ability to transform the unreal into the real through manufactured consensus. By insisting that something unpopular was popular often enough, they made it popular. And by insisting that something popular is really unpopular, they did the opposite.

    The Solomon Asch study showed that people will change their correct answers to conform with the wrong answers that are being given by others. The false consensus has operated on that same paradigm, convincing people of two lies; that the wrong answer is the right answer and that everyone else has already agreed that the wrong answer is correct.

    Doing all that is impossible unless people lose touch with the real. The wraparound nature of the media has made it so that the unreal never goes away. The unreal is so pervasive because it has so many outlets and we are all wired into one or more of them. If the unreal doesn't get into your head one way, it will do it another way. The viral virus adapts because its designers are intelligent. And most of all they are persistent. They aren't just malicious or in it for the money, though both those things are also true, they believe. They are missionaries and their goal is to convert you into fodder for their malicious money machine.

    virtual_reality_head

    Reality hasn't gone away, but we have gone away from it. Enough of us have gone down into the dream, grasped a thread of the story and allowed it to sweep us away. Given a choice between the red pill and the blue pill, they have unconsciously chosen the blue pill without ever being aware that they had a choice. And they are cushioned in this virtual world by a government that promises to take care of them and their children and their children's children until the end of time.

    It's a lie, but knowing a lie for what it is requires either being able to do the math or have the common sense to know it for what it is. And common sense is derived from rough and tumble contact with reality. And reality has gotten harder to find these days. It requires unplugging all the belief channels, stepping out into the fresh air and trying to see what still remains when all the things that the belief trends told you to believe in have gone away.
    [Related Article: The Sovietized American Media]

    There is a very specific category of people who are uncomfortable with the way things are and for the most part these are the people who have ongoing forcible contact with realities that don't go away when the talking head begins jabbering, the memes begin spewing and the trending topics trend. These are the people who work for a living outside the bubble, who know that external safety nets are unreliable and that they are always on the edge of something... even if they don't always know what.

    It isn't wealth that is the determinant. Many of the wealthy occupy a wholly unreal world. A world where things happen because they want them to. It's what makes the technocracy of the last three administrations so seductive to powerful men and women who begin to think that they truly can move the world. It's the edge that matters, the sharp sense of pain that reminds you that there is a sharp reality here that isn't going away.

    In a world where the fake seems real, the real seems fake. Obama seems more real than Romney and Ryan because he has mastered the art of the unreal. Television reality is not the same thing as reality, but it can seem more real, that is until you see how fake television makeup appears in real life. But there is no more real life in that sense. Not anymore.

    the_fake_media

    Television is no longer a thing into which people step into and then step out of again. It no longer has that sense of being a passing moment where an appearance is insubstantial because it is temporary. Now television is permanent. It doesn't turn off late at night, the eagle doesn't fly above a painted backdrop while the anthem plays. It is everywhere because video is everywhere. Everything is being captured on video through the eyes of surveillance cameras, teenagers pointing cell phones at each other and men sitting in their room and declaiming at a webcam. The real and the fake have merged to spawn something that is real enough to be properly fake and fake enough to pass for real. It is a collective creative act, our final artform whose title is simply, "Life", as envisioned by those who no longer know what life is.

    Obama feels real because he has that same unreal quality, that sense of always being onstage, of an actor who is never out of character because he is always performing. It is an artificial reality that seems super-real, because like video it has that intensity and immediacy that exists to satiate the attention deficit disorder with a surfeit of stimulation. It seems real, only because we no longer know what real is.

    When a disaster happens, people reach for an instant baseline of comparison in a movie. Real tragedy seems unreal because it seems cinematic. The story of Obama is equally cinematic, it is real because it is like a movie. Except it isn't a movie, and yet it is, because we experience it in two ways, through the real connection with the economic consequences of his policies, and through the unreal display of his teleprompter fed blatherings, the easy grin that he practices in a mirror and the eyes that never quite look at anything because they are their own reflection.

    obama-teleprompter-reuters

    Obama is a real disaster that seems cinematic. We have all seen this movie, but we have seen two versions of the movie. In one version, a bad unfit man climbs to power and ruthlessly abuses power to achieve his ends. In the other version, a good saintly man is elected and fights desperately to keep the bad men from abusing power. Which of those movies you think you are watching depends on a variety of factors. But the problem is that reality isn't a movie. And it doesn't go away when you change the channel.

    When all the bubbles of rhetoric pop, there are still the hard unpleasant realities to deal with. Bailouts and money pits can only bury them for so long. Governments sending money to banks and swapping worthless commodities that only exist in the theory of a theory only work for as long as people believe in them.

    Even an unreal economy reported on by an unreal media cheering on an unreal leader can only run for so long until reality punches through the illusion, the curtain falls, the magicians scramble off the stage with rabbits and doves tucked into their pants, and everyone wakes up to realize that the dream is over and we realize that we are entering a world where the stories no longer matter and history is about to begin.
    [Related Article: Trusting God As Freedom Fades]

  • How Much More Can You Take?

    America's Tyranny Threshold

    Author: Eileen F. Toplansky
    Source: American Thinker - 8.19.2013

    Obama-smirks

    As he finishes up his Martha's Vineyard vacation, Barack Obama would be well-served to recall the fiery words of Jonathan Mayhew, who is famous for his sermons "espousing American rights -- the cause of liberty, and the right and duty to resist tyranny."

    Mayhew, born at Martha's Vineyard on October 8, 1720, was "bitterly opposed to the Stamp Act and urged colonial liberties." Though he did not live to see the American Revolution (he died on July 9, 1766), his "sermons and writing were a powerful influence in the development of the movement for liberty and independence."

    And they need to be revisited as the Obama presidency continues its legacy of lawlessness.
    [Related Article: Praying for Richmond, VA]

    First published in Boston in 1750, "A Discourse concerning the unlimited submission and non-resistance to the high powers" was a sermon delivered on the 100th anniversary of the execution of Charles I. It was so powerful that it was published in London in 1752 and again in 1767. In fact, this sermon was the "first volley of the American Revolution, setting forth the intellectual and scriptural justification for rebellion against the Crown."

    The following words from the Discourse fly off the page in light of the continuing unconstitutional acts of President Obama.

    "Civil tyranny is usually small in its beginning, like 'the drop in a bucket,' till at length, like a mighty torrent of raging waves of the sea, it bears down all before it and deluges whole countries and empires."

    Although the president cannot write or rewrite laws, this president thinks he is above the law. The "entire system of separation of powers ... is designed to limit governmental power," but Mr. Obama continually makes it clear "that he won't respect these basic constitutional limits on his power."

    "Tyranny brings ignorance and brutality along with it. It degrades men from their just rank into the class of brutes. It dampens their spirits. It suppresses arts. It extinguishes every spark of noble ardor and generosity in the breasts of those who are enslaved by it."

    And American young people are being dampened in their enthusiasm for their futures because of the actions emanating from this White House. A millennial caller on the Rush Limbaugh radio show recently made the astonishing comment that her generation is being told there is no hope for the future. Like the serfs of the feudal system, young people in Obama's America "are predestined to misery and failure," because they no longer have "any free will," and only the government can provide and coddle this generation because upward mobility is no longer possible. The Horatio Alger belief in hard work bringing rewards is being destroyed by this administration as it deliberately burdens generations of Americans, some not even born.

    Thank you, Mr. Obama, for $17 trillion in debt, increasing unemployment, prohibitions against genuine American energy-independence, and onerous regulations on critical aspects of life.

    "[Civil tyranny] makes naturally strong and great minds feeble and little and triumphs over the ruins of virtue and humanity. This is true of tyranny in every shape. There can be nothing great and good where its influence reaches."

    Concerning ObamaCare alone, Obama's tyranny has grown incrementally. Delaying provisions of the ACA law does not lie within the purview of the executive branch. This authority is with the Congress. But we have a president who has repeatedly stated that he "can do this without Congress." In April Obama "delayed a provision...to cap out-of- pocket health care costs." He also decided to delay the employer mandate for a year. This exceeds his authority. The president continues to ignore the court's ruling that his National Labor Relations Board recess appointments were unconstitutional since they were not approved by Congress.

    Further acts by the Obama administration that are inconsistent with the laws of America include:

    - This administration was displeased with Congress's failure to enact the DREAM Act. So in 2012 he "implemented portions of legislation he could not get through Congress ... and acted in ways blatantly at odds with the existing immigration laws [.]"
    - Concerning the "No Child Left Behind" law, Obama, "unable to convince Congress to revise key provisions of the law, simply authorized waivers from many requirements of the law -- except that the 'No Child Left Behind' does not provide for such waivers."
    - Furthermore, Obama waived a "central tenet of the Clinton welfare-reform law" by eliminating the requirements that recipients of welfare either work or prepare to do so through approved education or training. This federal work requirement is not subject to waiver, but Obama ignored the law.
    - More recently, Obama is working "to unilaterally impose a tax on cell phones," maintaining that "where Congress is unwilling to act, I will take whatever administrative steps that I can in order to do right by the American people." But "[c]onstitutionally, it's Congress that decides how federal funds should be spent." Yet this president uses his bully pulpit to circumvent the proper safeguards that the Founding Fathers built into our system.

    In 1765, with the Stamp Act fresh in everyone's mind, Mayhew stated that the "essence of slavery, consists in subjection to others -- 'whether many, few, or but one, it matters not.'"

    Thus, he wrote:

    "Those nations who are now groaning under the iron scepter of tyranny were once free. So they might probably have remained by a seasonable caution against despotic measures."

    Though "seasonable caution" is being heard in the country, there are still Americans who do not sense the looming danger that this president represents as he ignores the Constitution, appoints people who continue to break the law with impunity, and has overweening contempt for America and her ideas and ideals. He flouts the law as he sees fit.

    Mayhew asserts:

    "Since magistrates who execute their office well, are common benefactors to society; and may, in that respect, be properly stiled the ministers and ordinance of God; and since they are constantly employed in the service of the public; it becomes you to pay them tribute and custom; and to reverence, honor, and submit to, them in the execution of their respective offices." This is apparently good reasoning. But does this argument conclude for the duty of paying tribute, custom, reverence, honor and obedience, to such persons as (although they bear the title of rulers) use all their power to hurt and injure the public?"

    Yet:

    "For what can be more absurd than an argument thus framed?. Common tyrants, and public oppressors, are not entitled to obedience from their subjects[.]"

    Although he was writing with reference to the oppressiveness of the kingly or monarchical government, Mayhew reminds his readers that:

    "The essence of government (I mean good government); ....consists in the making and executing of good laws--laws attempered to the common felicity of the governed. And if this be, in fact, done, it is evidently, in it self, a thing of no consequence at all, what the particular form of government is;--whether the legislative and executive power be lodged in one and the same person, or in different persons;--whether in one person, whom we call an absolute monarch;--whether in a few, so as to constitute an aristocracy;--whether in many, so as to constitute a republic; or whether in three co-ordinate branches, in such manner as to make the government partake something of each of these forms; and to be, at the same time, essentially different from them all. If the end be attained, it is enough."

    But he reminds his readers:

    "...nothing can well be imagined more directly contrary to common sense, than to suppose that millions of people should be subjected to the arbitrary, precarious pleasure of one single man; (who has naturally no superiority over them in point of authority) so that their estates, and every thing that is valuable in life, and even their lives also, shall be absolutely at his disposal, if he happens to be wanton and capricious enough to demand them. What unprejudiced man can think, that God made ALL to be thus subservient to the lawless pleasure and frenzy of ONE, so that it shall always be a sin to resist him!"

    resist-tyranny

    Continuing regulations emanate from this White House on a daily basis. We will soon have no control over our health decisions; businesses are being burdened in oppressive ways. IRS and NSA scandals are nonchalantly described as "phony scandals."

    A man who has no shame has no right to be a leader. Obama has abused the trust of the American people.

    "But it is equally evident, upon the other hand, that those in authority may abuse their trust and power to such a degree, that neither the law of reason, nor of religion, requires, that any obedience or submission should be paid to them: but, on the contrary, that they should be totally discarded; and the authority which they were before vested with, transferred to others, who may exercise it more to those good purposes for which it is given[.]"

    We already have the necessary means to resist the assault on our republic. But we must be unrelenting in demanding that the Congress meet its obligations and restore the checks and balances our Founding Fathers created. If legislators do not adhere to the Constitution, they have no right to be in Washington, D.C.

    Certainly Obama has taken on the trappings of an emperor, despite his protestations, but are we not obliged to resist? He has broken the pledge to uphold the Constitution. He has been derelict in his duty. The National Black Republican Association (NBRA) has filed articles of impeachment against Barack Obama. And other calls for impeachment are increasing.

    It was with "unfeigned love" for his country that Mayhew wrote. In his sermon entitled "The Snare Broken," he wrote of the joy that Americans felt when Great Britain repealed the onerous Stamp Act in March 1766. However, on the same day, "Parliament passed the Declaratory Acts, asserting that the British government had free and total legislative power over the colonies." Mayhew died less than two months after this event, and, though eminently prescient, he was not privy to the continuing intrusions of Great Britain into America's well-being that ultimately led to the American Revolution.

    Will we take to heart these words of Mayhew, or will we, too, "groan under the iron scepter of tyranny" in the not too distant future?

    american-minutemen


  • Sinners Fallen Short

    gospel_salvation


    GUILTY AS CHARGED

    Romans 3:9-20

    The route of personal righteousness is clearly marked, "no road to heaven this way." For we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

    Preacher: Dennis Davidson
    Source: SermonCentral.com

    Men like to believe that they are basically good, but fallen natural man is under sin. In other words, all men are sinners, both by character and by conduct. Men may not be equal in their sinning but we are all condemned as sinners. Each and every person, religious (Jew) or irreligious (Gentile), stands guilty before the bar of God's justice.
    Paul has built God's case against the pagan world (1:18-32), against those who think they are good (2:1-16), and against God's people (2:17-3:8). Now with devastating finality he reveals that the whole human race stands condemned.
    Through the indictment of God's Word Paul proves that every one is a sinner or stands morally bankrupt in God's eyes. Scripture's repeated testimony of "all" and "none" assert mankind's universal guilt.
    If there is to be any hope for any individual it must be found in the mercy and grace of God. Because of the unalterable fact that all are sinners the way of acceptance before God is totally closed. No actions of righteousness or good deeds can open the way to God. The route of personal righteousness is clearly marked, "no road to heaven this way." For we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (C.I.T.).
    [Related Article: Nice People Go to Hell]

    I. Sinners by Character, 9-12.
    II. Sinners by Conduct, 13-18.
    III. Sinners Under Condemnation, 19-20.

    I. SINNERS BY CHARACTER, (9-12).

    Before Paul gives Scripture's charge he gives the indictment or arraignment in verse 9. "What then? Are we better than they? Not by any means; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin;"
    In the previous passage Paul insisted that the Jews had special privileges because they were entrusted with the Oracles of God. But this does not mean that the Jews are better than anyone else. (to be held before - as an example). They are not, but from a different piece of cloth or from a different mold than every one else. Every one is under condemnation from the most reprobate, vice-ridden pagan, to the most outwardly moral and upright Jew. The entire human race, with no exceptions, is "charged" as a sinner before God's court of justice.

    [Related Article: Wendy McCreary and the Sedgefield Community]

    God's charge is that all people, both Gentiles and Jews, are "under" the power of sin. The Greek phrase "under sin" is very suggestive. Hupo means "under the power of, under the authority of." As in Mt. 8:9 when the Centurion says he has "soldiers under me" meaning I have soldiers under my authority, control, power, or command. Without Christ man is under the dominion of sin and helpless to escape from it. He may move from one sin to the next sin, but he is always controlled by sin. To be under sin is to be under the authority of sin (Gal. 3:22; Rom. 7:44).

    [Related Article: Prayers for Richmond VA]

    Privileged or not privileged all stand equally in need of God's mercy and grace. Now, that is not to say that man has no moral consciousness. All men everywhere have a moral consciousness as Paul has previously stated.
    God universally gave every person and society MORAL DISCERNMENT. There is no family, no tribe, no people, nor any nation so degraded that it does not have a moral code of what is right and what is wrong. What the people think to be right and what they think to be wrong may be strange to us, but everyone has some moral sensitivity.

    When Charles Darwin went around the world, he came to the tip of South America and found a group of islands called Tierra del Fuego. He wrote that he had found in those islands a tribe so degraded that they had no moral sensitivity. He said, "I have found the missing link between the animal and the man, for these Tierra del Fuegans are without sensitivity." Some Christians in England read Darwin's statement and sent missionaries to Tierra del Fuego. Soon they reported that the Tierra del Fuegans were noble in their life and virtuous in their deportment. They had been won to Christ and were now disciples of the Lord. When Charles Darwin learned of the evangelization of the Tierra de Fuegans, he himself became a subscriber and a faithful contributor to the Church Missionary Society of London, England, which had sent out the missionaries. There are no people in the world who have ever lived or ever will live in whom the soul of moral discernment is not present.

    To validate the accusation that everybody is under sin six Old Testament passages (broken into three strophes in verses 10-18) are quoted. They are strung together like pearls to prove the doctrine of the universal sinfulness of mankind. The first set in verses 10 and 11 speaks to man's character. The first sentence in verse 10, quoted from Psalm 14:1, is like a theme for what follows. "As it is written. ‘There is none righteous not even one; there is none who understands, there is none who seeks for God."
    Men are not righteous and cannot be justified on the basis of their own righteousness in the sight of God. There are no exceptions. In verses 10-18 he uses the term none and not even one, six times in referring to man's absolute lack of righteousness before God.
    No one is right before God or is who God created and expected man to be. No one's inner being is righteous by God's standards. To prevent some people from thinking that there might be exceptions the Psalmist adds not even one. In other words a person that is not as good or righteous as God is not acceptable to God (Matt. 5:48).
    [Related Article: We Are Lost...]

    An old mountaineer had gained a reputation as the best shot in the area. The basis of his reputation were trees and fence posts with a bullet hole in the center of a painted target. The mountaineer's initials showed that he had fired the shot. Then one day someone happened to observe him in action. He lifted his rifle and fired at a distant tree. Then he went over and painted a target around the bullet hole. No wonder he always hit the bull's eye!
    Some people are offended by the Bible's proclamation that all have sinned, that there is no one righteous. These people say: "I'm no sinner. I'm a good and righteous person." Usually the bolster their argument by pointing to the sins in the lives of other. In saying that all have sinned and there is none righteous, God does not claim that all are reprobates. Nor does He mean that all have committed the same sins or that all are equally sinful.
    God does claim that when measured by the perfect standard of the life of Jesus, we all fall short. Anything that separates us from God is a sin. Self-righteousness keeps multitudes of people from seeking God's mercy and grace. Confess your unrighteousness to God and thank Him for His grace.

    [Related Article: Salvation (for Richmond, VA)]

    The second quote found in verse 11 (Psalm 14:2; 53:3) says that man is not only universally unrighteous but all are spiritually incompetent. There is none who understands. The word "understands" means to bring together, to grasp, to comprehend. Understand expresses the right comprehension of divine truth (Matt. 13:15; Acts 7:25; Eph. 3:4; 5:17). It is a flat out negative statement concerning mankind's universal lack of understanding God. Misunderstanding (or indifference) to God and His way is the second characteristic of man under sin.
    Right comprehension or spiritual discernment of divine things is always accompanied with right affections and right pursuits, thus, the third denunciation "there is none who seeks for God." He that does not understand proves he does not understand by not seeking after God. If anyone truly understood If anyone truly understood who God is or their circumstance, they would seek after Him with all their heart, soul, mind and strength.
    [The expression "seeking God" includes all the pursues of longing after, worship, and obedience resulting from the understanding of spiritual things.]
    Verse 12 notes the devastating power of universal sin. "All have turned aside, together they have become useless; there is no one who does good, there is not even one."

    A fourth universal characteristic is crookedness, not walking in the narrow path of God. Blinded by their sin to the perfections and loveliness of God and truth each has turned from the way which God has prescribed. God calls man to His way because it leads to Him but man has chosen another way. All have turned aside from God and His will.
    [Related Article: The War Of Unimaginable Consequences]

    The fifth characteristic of the Christ-less character is unprofitableness in the eternal economy of God. Natural man can do nothing of eternal benefit (John 15:5). Men do not understand, thus they do not seek God but seek another way, the result is that they become useless. The Hebrew word in Psalm 14:3 for useless means to go bad, to become sour like milk. This is what happens to the moral goodness of man.

    A sixth characteristic here is the absence pure good or positives in men's lives. It is impossible to do something "good" in God's eyes without being in Christ. Our righteousness, the best we can do, Isaiah says "is as filthy rags" before God (Isa. 64:60). The world has been inscrutably searched throughout all the ages and "not even one" truly righteous was found.
    [Good represents that virtue which shows itself in a zeal for truth while having a gentle and kindly attitude for one's neighbor.] Paul definitely believed the Bible teaches the universal depravity of the fallen human nature.

    genuine-repentance


    II. SINNERS BY CONDUCT (13-17).

    The next sections emphasizes some ramifications of sin in human conduct. The first element of conduct dealt with in verses 13 & 14 is man's speech which prove his gross immorality. "Their throat is an open grave, With their tongues they keep deceiving," "The poison of asps is under their lips;" "Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness."
    First in verse 13 is the destructive power that gives the tongue its utterances. Their throat is an open sepulcher (Psalm 5:9). If you can imagine a grave with a body in it that has been decaying for a few days and the stench it lets off, you can get an idea of the natural man's speech as heard by God. The idea may also include that as the grave is insatiable, never satisfied, so our communication appears to God. We are always communicating our lack of satisfaction in spite of the intricate and wonderfully made creation we are and the bountiful world in which we live.
    The second use of their tongues is to deceive themselves and others. They make smooth, flattering statements which deceive, like "you're ok, I'm ok." or "I'm OK, your not OK." Or assertions designed to mislead or misrepresent. The imperfect tense denotes repeated actions or perseverance in their hypocritical statements.
    The third graphic description of Christless speech is quoted from Psalm 140:3. "Asps" is the word used for the deadly Egyptian Cobra. The bite of the asp causes the severest pain as well as producing death. To verbally inflict suffering is a delight to the maligned who have chosen their own way instead of God's way. The natural man is truly diabolical.
    The fourth quote concerning speech is from Psalm 10:17. Cursing carries the idea of pronouncing ill will upon someone or thing. Bitterness is from to cut, prick, hence literally "pointed or sharp." Here it means sharp pointed statements. Bitterness can be rooted in jealousy (since the word etymologically is).

    Verses 15-17 indicate the conduct in actions of Christless man. The eleventh charge is their murderous intent put forth in verse 15. "Their feet are swift to shed blood." Though the quote is from the O.T. (Isa. 59:7) it shows how little man has changed. We are still people who desire to see violence and do violence. Just look for a while at our sports, our TV shows, our movies. Look at the news and see what goes on in our country and around the world. Violence is news. Wars all over the surface of the earth and people verbally making war over the wars.
    The word shed is "pour out." We are a people who desire to see violence and do violence. Human life has little value to most men.

    "Even in the United States, with its Christian heritage, since the turn of the twentieth century twice as many of its citizens have been slain in private acts of murder than have been killed in all the wars of its entire history. According to researcher Arnold Barnett of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a child born today in any one of the fifty largest cities in the United States has the chance of one in fifty of being murdered. Dr. Barnett estimated that a baby born in the 1980's is more likely to be murdered than an American soldier in World War II was of being killed in combat."
    (MacArthur, NT Com. p190).

    The greatest violence and blood shed in our culture is seen in abortion. Since the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision there have been more than 48 million babies killed. [Related Article: The Negro Project...]
    The twelfth charge in the overall indictment is in verse 16. "Destruction and misery are in their paths."
    Just as feet speak of man's ways so do paths. Natural man's paths through life is marked with spreading ruin and misery to the lives of others. The destruction ( µµ means "to break or dash into pieces") and misery of lost sinners may not occur immediately, but they will come inevitably.
    The thirteenth and last of the charges in the indictment of condemned man is his lack of peace in verse 17. "And the path of peace they have not known."
    The apostle is not speaking of the lack of inner peace - although that is certainly a characteristic of the ungodly person - but of man's essential inclination away from peace. They know not how to preserve peace with others nor how to obtain peace for themselves. This charge is therefore something of a counterpart to the previous one.

    They may talk of peace as they did in Jeremiah's day (Jer. 6:14), but they are strangers to true peace. Every man is a stranger to inner peace until he knows and follows the Prince of Peace.
    The basic reason for man's deplorable condition is expressed in verse 18 which is a quote from Psalm 36:1. "There is no fear of God before their eyes."
    All the previous scriptural proofs are because of this last summation. Man's depravity proves he does not fear God. People who live wicked lives are destitute of the fear of God.
    The fear of God, according to Scripture, is a reverence for God, a respect for Him, or fear in the sense of dreading His anger. The reckless and wicked are lacking this attitude toward God. They act as if there is no God who will hold them responsible for their character, conversation and conduct.

    [It is astonishing that men, while they acknowledge that there is a God, should act without any fear of His displeasure. Yet this is their character. They fear a unrighteous men like themselves, but disregard the Most High. They are more afraid of man than of God. They fear of man's anger, contempt, or ridicule. The fear of man prevents them from doing many things from which they are not restrained by the fear of God....They love not His character, not rendering to Him the veneration that is He due. They respect not His authority. Such is the state of human nature while the heart is unchanged (Robert Haldane, Exposition of Romans, p. 121).]
    When I've talked to people about the fear of the Lord some respond and like this, "You're not afraid of God, are you? I'd never believe in that kind of God." Well, yes, I am afraid of God, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.
    I'm also afraid of water. That doesn't mean I don't love to fish, swim or go boating.. I do. But I don't ever want to forget about the life-taking power of a river, a lake, or an ocean. In the same way, I respect electricity, gasoline, and high ladders while I'm working with them. To enjoy their benefits without recognizing their dangers would be foolish.

    Yes, I fear God in the sense that I reverence Him and stand in awe of His holiness and power. And because I do, I love Him and want to draw close to Him in through obedience to His will. It's my desire to love what He loves and hate what He hates. I want to live my whole life with the realization that He deserves more fear than anyone or anything. Satan and people can destroy the body. But God can destroy the soul and cast it into Hell-fire. I believe only as I know enough to fear Him do I know enough to understand and love Him. As that love develops will it dispel all unnecessary fear
    (1 John 4). Remember as C.S. Lewis said of Aslan, "He is not a tame lion."

    persuasion

    III. SINNERS UNDER CONDEMNATION (19-20).

    The conclusion reached by Scripture is given in verses 19 & 20. Verse 19, "Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God;"

    Referencing the things just said as being from the Law, Scripture now says "we know," indicating that it is plain or universally understood. The Law is the will of God which is the norm or rule to which individuals and societies are to conform their life. It can be the Ten Commandments, the Law of Moses, the Scriptures (John 10:34), or even the rule of God written on man's heart (John 2:14), in his conscience (John 2:15), and in nature (John 1:19,20).

    Absolute silence will be the response at the final judgment. When God open His books and prosecutes those standing before Him, unredeemed man, when given the opportunity to answer the charges, will have no defense. Their guilt having been exposed, they will have no answer. Their mouths will be silenced, stopped.
    God's just judgment will be concluded in such a way that "all the world becomes accountable to God." Accountable is a legal term meaning liable or answerable. Everyone will be guilty and liable for their sin in God's court.

    [Related Article: The Shocking Youth Message]

    Some people think of God as a heavenly tyrant whose main purpose is to keep people from enjoying themselves. They consider guilt as one of God's strategies to keep people from enjoying life. Such people are only partially right. They are right that God does confront us with the uncomfortable reality of our sins. They are wrong in failing to recognize that divine love is behind His actions. He is like a surgeon, who must expose and cut out the malignancy for the good of the patient. Throughout all His dealings with us, His purpose is life and health.
    Strangely, people use all kinds of excuses, alibis, and objections to try and avoid recognizing and repenting of their sins. If we dare to let God speak to us through His Word, our boisterous mouths will be stopped. We will see our excuses for what they are - evasions of the truth and denials of our deep need. When we are willing to hear God's condemnation, we are ready to hear His yes of divine grace. Ask God, who sees your heart, to help you put aside all excuses and evasion of Him and His Word.

    Verse 20 concludes this discussion of the universal condemnation of mankind. "Because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin."
    Paul again quotes Scripture (Psalm 14:3:2) to prove his point. This is the conclusion his whole argument has moved toward. Men can not be justified by their own righteousness or works. A purpose of the Law is to produce a consciousness of sin. For "no flesh" can fulfill what the Law, the righteous requirements of God, demands. You may justify yourself before man, but not before God. God therefore must save sinners by some other means. The explanation of the means by which man can be saved is taught in the rest of the letter.

    repentance

    CONCLUSION

    Paul uses multiple Old Testament references to show that humanity in its present sinful condition, is unacceptable before God. Have you ever thought to yourself, "Well, I'm not too bad. I'm a pretty good person?" Look at these verses and see if any of them apply to you. Have you ever lied? Have you ever hurt someone by your words or tone of voice? Are you bitter toward anyone? Do you become angry with those who strongly disagree with you?
    In thought, word, and deed, you, like everyone else in the world, stand guilty before God. We must remember who we are in His sight - alienated sinners. Don't deny that you are a sinner. Instead, allow your desperate need to point you toward Christ.

    Has your mouth ever stopped defending yourself and accepted your guilt before God? Are you still boasting of your own self righteousness and defending yourself before God. It is only as we stand silent before Him acknowledging our guilt that He can save us. As long as we defend ourselves and commend ourselves we cannot be saved by God's grace. Come confessing your guilt and need of grace today.

    salvation1